Webkit css1/1/2023 ![]() ![]() This can also work with images, favicons, and JavaScript. The browser will be able to cache the CSS file, but when you make any changes to your CSS the browser will see this as a new URL, so it won't use the cached copy. This way, you never have to modify the link tag again, and the user will always see the latest CSS. Now, wherever you include your CSS, change it from this: )įirst, we use the following rewrite rule in. (Because 10 digits covers all timestamps from to. The solution is to only rewrite if there are exactly 10 digits at the end. htaccess regex can cause problems with files like json-1.3.js. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. This solution is written in PHP, but it should be easily adapted to other languages. dabblet.css This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. So, is there some kind of project or movement to a standard rendering engine that ALL browsers will use? Will HTML5 bring an end to the cross-browser compatibility issues? I guess this is a big reason why there are so many cross-browser compatibility issues! #WEBKIT CSS UPDATE#The ultimate question… Is WebKit supported by IE? Update 2Īll of the major browsers use different rendering engines. Are there such engines for IE/Opera/Firefox and what are the differences, pros and cons of using one over the other? Can I use WebKit features in Firefox for example? So from the answers so far… WebKit is a HTML/CSS web browser rendering engine for Safari/Chrome. #WEBKIT CSS CODE#properties in the source code for various websites. ![]() ![]() So what is this "webkit" and how does it relate to CSS? I have also noticed a lot of -webkit. Such questions usually tend to be web-based questions relating to CSS, jQuery, layouts, cross-browers compatibility issues, etc… e.g.More recently, I have been seeing questions with the tag "webkit". The only change is: after the load of the first CSS, flush the rendering queue by requesting a style information. This was only happening sometimes, but after forming and testing an hypothesis, I was able to distill a reproducible test case. If there's a paint going on between the two stylesheets, the browser dumps the unstyled content on the page. This is the issue that Jeff and Andrey found and were floored. While issue #1 is just a bummer that can be done better for the progressive feedback-y user experience, #2 is a bug. Bummer! Issue #2: painting unstyled content But webkit (chrome, safari, mobile safari) doesn't paint anything, waiting for the second CSS. You see in the console we know (in JavaScript) that CSS has arrived. So turns out that here webkit also waits for both CSS files to arrive before rendering anything. For example they wait for all CSS (even useless print and other stylesheets) to arrive and block the rendering of the page. As this book was going to press, the WebKit team announced that it is going to implement many new experimental features in its. You know that browsers batch layout and paints tasks because these tend to be expensive. Test for yourself (in Firefox) #1 issue: "efficient" webkit In FF, whenever the the first CSS is loaded, we see a new module. Oh, and here's the load() function that runs when the user clicks the button "load" initiating the new modules to appear:įunction load ( ) ( i ) ) The question is what does the user see during the ?-mark - between the first CSS is done and the second one is still loading. The first module is pinky, the second is yellow. No one cares which module shows first, as long as they show up as soon as possible. Expected behavior: whenever a module and its CSS dependency arrive - show that module. Both modules are requested at about the same time. Two "modules" (or "widgets") of the app require two different CSS files. Otherwise content will be weirdly styled. Only when the external CSS arrives should the app show the content. But content is complex (and app is as lazy-loading as possible) and content requires extra CSS. This post brought to you via Facebook engineers Jeff Morrison and Andrey Sukhachev, who discovered and helped isolate the issue. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |